Sound Familiar?

"For example, Saunders quotes William Gray's off-the-cuff criticism of a study by Naomi Oreskes that demonstrated the existence of an overwhelming consensus in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the reality of anthropogenic climate change (see our previous discussion of that study). Yet Saunders is unable to muster a single counter-example to challenge Oreskes' findings."

It's no accident since there aren't any, only wingerville false analogies and assertions of naysayer believers. This is the same circus of smears we see every day played out on the media stage.