Defining the Factless Response
As usual your comments are bereft of any insight or intelligence. A substancial rebuttal usually implies doing more then [sic] quoting a couple of new york times columns.Any legitimate rebuttal requires more than an ad hominem attack. The fact I was exposing in the history review post was the poor NYT reporter stationed in Afghanistan in 2001 covering a stone age country in chaos. A lonely beat until 9-11. To far leftists it was an idyllic state and then we ruined it. Uh uh.
posted by Mark at 7:57 PM
1 Comments:
Gee, would have never guessed from the atrocious spelling, lack of paragraph breaks, and the hostile tone. That is not what they were referring to at all. They meant the "idylic Taliban" who herd women like cattle, but they get a pass and somehow these byzantine cultural practices are Reagan's fault in your twisted world? I'm no fan of his, but only a fool with something to hide plays this master of the universe false cause fallacy and believes it.
The Mujahadeen became the Northern Alliance, not Al Qaeda and the Taliban you moronic witch. They were the ones helping us overthrow the latter two. What a dingbat.
Post a Comment
<< Home