Friday, May 06, 2005

Oil For Food

Paul Volcker says there is "no evidence that Kofi Annan knew of contract with his son's company." Do you think that will stop the wingers? I don't.

19 Comments:

Anonymous john said...

I doubt it, not when there are boxes of evidence claiming to prove kofi is a liar.

4:22 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

They only exist in youer mind John.

5:28 PM  
Anonymous john said...

no, they exist in the House Internation Relations Committee, because Robert Parton, former Oil-for-Food investigator, turned them over to Congress. you can read about it here.

12:24 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

The conclusion: liar is yours and not supported by evidence.

10:10 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

"which may contain information potentially harmful to Annan, sources have told FOX News."

First it's FOX so innuendo is the order of the day. The sources are anonymous. May contain inconsistancies does not translate to "he lied." Unless you have that conclusion already.

10:15 AM  
Anonymous john said...

geez, mark... you don't even read before you react.

recap...
you: do you think that will stop the wingers?

me: not when there are boxes, claimed to prove kofi a liar.

you: only in your mind john

me: no, there are boxes, obtained by congress

you: the guy is a liar! foxnews is a liar!


fine. will you accept the news if it comes from the associated press?

11:34 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

You're truly a sad dupe. What's in the boxes? Only you know? The report won't say. You have a guilty until proven innocent thesis. I don't.

9:43 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

As I read it Parton felt the report was weak on Annan, but Volcker et al didn't based on the facts. Since they had the facts including the "boxes" it's unlikely that a partisan would be happy with contrary conclusions, like you, he did didn't already have to begin with. I'm sure he'll milk it for more than it's worth.

10:07 AM  
Anonymous john said...

for the last time, i didn't address kofi's guilt of anything. I only agreed with you, and explained why. you react with condescension, attacking me, attacking my source, calling names, and making false statements. its typical angry leftist behavior.
I think I'll abandon my rational attitude for a while and adopt your emotional attitude whenever I comment here.

5:36 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

I'm afraid you're inchoherent like most right-wingnuts. Guilt is the undisclosed military records; boxes of already rejected evidence and the like at least to your ilk.

7:32 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

"evidence claiming to prove kofi is a liar."

This isn't guilt?

7:34 PM  
Anonymous john said...

no, its not guilt... its the reason why the "wingnuts" won't stop, in answer to your post. they think the boxes have evidence. I take no position. I'm going to stop agreeing with you now, too. You're even wacky when I do that.

2:13 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

The boxes have evidence that has already been vetted by the panel. They think, and the thesis is, they do imply guilt, and the right-nuts use that. Guilt by innuendo.

If this isn't what you believe then I misread you.

8:35 AM  
Anonymous john said...

Its looking like the "wingers" might have been right on this one...
AP - Annan Failed to Disclose Key Contacts

12:34 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

Not really John if you actually read the story. Meeting someone and cutting a deal are two very different things.

9:07 AM  
Anonymous john said...

its amazing how far leftists will go to find a conspiracy theory implicating Bush or Cheney in some shady business deal and then present it as a fact. But when the actions of Kofi Annan look very very shady, it's suddenly "hey, i'm sure it's all kosher...let's give him the benefit of the doubt". hypocritical.

1:18 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

The shady deal's of Bush and Cheney are known. Neal Bush too. No digging is needed. Their people love them for that shamelessness. It's made them multi-millionaires and president and vice president.

8:26 AM  
Anonymous john said...

conspiracy theories, mark.

8:14 PM  
Blogger Mark said...

Factual analysis. Direct evidence. Good bye John. Stay away.

10:32 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

The Environmental Webring
The Environmental Webring
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]