Note To CNN

Intelligent Design is not "shaking up" science as the announcement put it. "Should it replace evolution in the classroom?" Collins supposes. It's duping journalists reporting a false balance and that's all it is. ID is not valid in science. It's laughable, but like all these insidious fantasies it co-opts its way into mainstream thought.

Behe is nuts and he is indeed arguing for an idea almost everyone does accept: a creator God. Most who do will accept anything that seems to support this belief. So what do they do? Play the scientists with evolutionary proof in hand, unlike Behe, with a family on a Noah's Ark trip to a zoo. In other words, false balance, view from nowhere appeal to inappropriate authority. Unbelieveable. No wonder people are confused.