Butthead's Logic
So GM Roper here thinks he can take on the global warming debate with this atrocious fighter in his corner. Pitiful. I've sent the argument to the folks he's playing against with these nuts. Update to come, but I know the answer already. I know it because I can tell what is propaganda and what is scientifically sound. So can the professionals at realclimate.
Here's the source for the sad deniers: A conservative think tank . Led by Dr. Fred Singer this bunch isn't even close to being credible. In fact it's a perfect example of the opposite of what they claim: the politicization of science. That's exactly what it is so, mission accomplished and only those wingerville residents will buy it. A damn shame that many of us are still that stupid in this day and age.
Here's the source for the sad deniers: A conservative think tank . Led by Dr. Fred Singer this bunch isn't even close to being credible. In fact it's a perfect example of the opposite of what they claim: the politicization of science. That's exactly what it is so, mission accomplished and only those wingerville residents will buy it. A damn shame that many of us are still that stupid in this day and age.
posted by Mark at 10:03 PM
10 Comments:
He and Roper couldn't find their ass with both hands. That was my obscene comment he tried to smear me with. He doesn't know jack squat about anything and proves it daily. What dickhead.
"Concerned Scientists" who are in the fields of psychology or other specialties unrealted to our climate?"
Horseshit. That's a bald face lie. The scientists on my side of this so-called debate, like Intelligent Design it's only a debate with a moron on the other end of the table, are the top climate scientists in the world, such as the ones at Realclimate. What fools Woody et al are. Nothing but right-wing propgandists.
Woody could have had a science show -- on local cable access which can't deny anyone a show.
Good point: Woody's World.
Look, we all know that global warming is really Bush and Haliburton's fault. If Haliburton would just approve the damn Kyoto treaty, global warming would end within a week. My biggest fear is that Kyoto, signed by Clinton, would be TOO good and that it would get too cold in some places on mother earth. But too cold sure beats global warming!
Another party from Woody's World unable to think straight.
Same template of naysayer igniorance. I say that because you are. Here's the deal the claims you make are fallacious. Argrument is here: www.realclimate.org To read, then try to refute. That's the template.
Realclimate is not just some political opinion. It's the consensus of the experts in the field. What you don't get Seth is from behind your blinders and anonymity, truth can't be seen. I've easily refuted all of your assertions about why we shouldn't accept GW. It's not that they agree with me. It's I agree with their scientific peer-reviewed method. They are the appeal to authority. You are an appeal to NO authority. Do you see the difference?
Note to home: you don't have that.
Propagandists will be deleted on sight since they're incapable of learning.
That's exactly it Randy. I've completely lost patience with these people. As far as I'm concerned they're a cult like the moonies.
Post a Comment
<< Home